Explicitly named on PA #14–#16
Investigator view
Open a recipient. See the entire trail around it.
This workspace connects exact published evidence: payment dates, amounts, methods, repeated values, memo references, name variants, months, and source files. Missing fund or department links remain visibly broken.
Construction payment applications
Recipient cluster
Capital Excavation Company
Eleven ACH payments form an explicit payment-application sequence. The most recent three name the Goodwin / Conrads project.
Total paid$13,100,868
Published rows11
Months active8 / 9
Methods100% ACH
Published memo numbers progress over time
Three linked payments, May–June 2026
The check-register rows do not expose an accounting fund.
Chronology
How the trail changes over time
Rows and dollars are kept together so a spike is never detached from its cadence.
Oct 23, 2025
$2.8M1 row · PA #7
Oct 30, 2025
$1.5M1 row · PA #8
Dec 11, 2025
$1.8M1 row · PA #9
Jan 8, 2026
$775.2K1 row · PA #10
Feb 5, 2026
$590.1K1 row · PA #11
Apr 1, 2026
$1.3M1 row · PA #12–13
May 14, 2026
$597.8K1 row · PA #14 · Goodwin / Conrads
Jun 17, 2026
$3M1 row · PA #15 · Goodwin / Conrads
Jun 25, 2026
$511.8K1 row · PA #16 · Goodwin / Conrads
Evidence test
What this establishes
Every row uses ACH
Every payment has a published memo
Memo numbering creates a chronological sequence
Three newest rows explicitly share a project name
What remains unknown
No contract number in the register
No fund, department, or purchase order field
Project budget and change orders require separate records
Connections are evidence-backed relationships inside accepted city records. Suggested threads are questions for further document review, not findings of wrongdoing.